JAC Online

Rights and Responsibilities of Covenant
-a look at Judges 2
by Captain Michael Ramsay

Judges 2:1,2: The angel of the LORD went up from Gilgal to Bokim and said, “I brought you up out of Egypt and led you into the land that I swore to give to your forefathers. I said, ‘I will never break my covenant with you, and you shall not make a covenant with the people of this land, but you shall break down their altars.’ Yet you have disobeyed me. Why have you done this?

 

This is a disappointing but very important passage from which to launch the stories of the Judges.[1] Reading a few verses further (Joshua 2:1-5) we learn why the Israelites and their allies suffer hundreds of years of oppression:[2] the cycle of sin, enslavement, repentance, deliverance, and sin again - which repeats until Israel finally descends into civil war and anarchy - this whole downward spiral[3] stems from one disobeyed promise; a disregarded covenant.

 

How we live in our covenant relationships has significant implications; our promises, our covenants are very important to God. The Lord promised His people that He would never break His covenant with them (Judges 2:1; cf. Lev 26:42-44, Deut 7:9). As such, instead of being released from our covenants before the Lord simply for disobeying them (cf. Romans 7:2), there are often serious consequences that result from taking our covenants lightly (cf. Num 33:55; Josh 23:13).

 

This is important for us as Salvationists to remember because we do have the opportunity to enter into rich and strong covenant relationships with the Lord in the form of our Officers’ and Soldiers’ covenants. It is important too for all of us living in the new covenant era of the post-resurrection world and especially for those of us living in the so-called ‘First World’ where litigation, broken contracts, and divorces[4] occur on a daily basis both inside and outside the churches. As Christians we should all be aware of exactly what we are getting into when we enter into a covenant. When we enter with the LORD as either a partner or a witness, we should realise to what we are agreeing.

 

Covenants are good.

Covenants with and before God are good things. The Lord uses covenants to give us direct access to strength, security, and blessing. The Lord made a promise to Abraham (Genesis 12) that all the nations of the earth with be blessed through him and this promise is ultimately fulfilled through Jesus Christ. The Lord made a covenant with Abraham (Gen. 15) that his descendents would at some point in time occupy the land promised to him. The Lord is faithful to His word. He does not break his covenants.[5] He is bound to us through His covenants.

 

This is good news and, as we have discussed in JAC before (Issues 52, 40) the most common word for covenant in the Hebrew Bible is berit[h],  (mentioned 286 times).[6] Berit[h] in all probability comes from the Akkadian word for ‘to shackle’[7] so the image of a covenant with (or in the presence of) the LORD then is of one actually being bound, shackled to him with a tie that will not be broken, a chain that cannot be severed.[8]

 

These covenantal ties are strong and trying to break them – like trying to snap out of iron shackles – will be unsuccessful and will naturally result in unpleasant consequences. Judges 2:3: “…you have disobeyed me…. Now therefore I tell you that I will not drive them [the Canaanites] out before you; they will be thorns in your sides and their gods will be a snare to you.” It is important for us to remember that there are consequences that result from rebelling against our covenants.

 

The episode around this covenant referred to in Judges 2 is particularly interesting. It relates to the covenant of Genesis 15 and it refers also to the covenant experience of Joshua 9.[9] God commanded Israel not to make a covenant with the Canaanites (Cf. Deut 7:1-6; 20:16-18);[10] God told the Israelites to destroy the Canaanites.[11] (This was after the people of Canaan had graciously been given 400 years and still did not repent of their own sins, cf. Gen 15:16.)

 

There are natural results of rebellion against covenants.

 

The Israelites did not follow in a proper covenant - Joshua 9:3ff:

“…when the people of Gibeon [who were Canaanites] heard what Joshua had done to Jericho and Ai, they resorted to a ruse [they tricked them]: they went as a delegation whose donkeys were loaded with worn-out sacks and old wineskins, cracked and mended. The men put worn and patched sandals on their feet and wore old clothes. All the bread of their food supply was dry and mouldy. Then they went to Joshua in the camp at Gilgal and said to him and the men of Israel, “We have come from a distant country; make a treaty with us.’”

 

Notice that the Canaanites lied to Joshua and the Israelite leaders; the leaders were tricked when made the treaty with the Canaanites (Joshua 9:15) - without first discussing the matter with God - and in doing this they disobeyed their earlier covenant with the LORD.

 

Betraying a promise to YHWH is not a trivial matter. In the book of Judges alone (and the breach of this particular covenant will come up again in other books: Joshua 9, 2 Samuel 21) generations of people suffer as a result of their forefathers’ broken promise to God. For hundreds of years, their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and even more than that experience the consequences of continuing in rebellion against this covenant and this promise. The natural results of not respecting our covenants with or before God (whether or not we are tricked into them, whether we consult God before we call Him as a witness: Joshua 9) can be devastating. There are consequences for ignoring our covenants and betraying our promises.

 

A contemporary example from the marriage covenant.

 

This should be easily understandable for us because this same thing still happens in our world today. Think about the children who are raised in broken homes. Think about the children whose parents rebelled against their marriage covenants with each other and before God[12] (Romans 7:2; 1 Corinthians 7:10-14; Luke 16:16-16; Mark 10:1-12; Matthew 5:32, 19:9: You will note in these references that – even if one ‘goes out on a limb’ in order to argue that you no longer need to live with the one you with whom you are covenanted in marriage – there is still no NT provision made for marrying a second or subsequent spouse while the one you covenanted before God with is still alive.) One is not released from one’s covenants simply by disobedience to them. God takes all our covenants seriously. There are consequences for not walking in a proper covenant.

 

Some of the consequences for rebelling against the marriage covenant through divorce are immediate and some of the immediate consequences are the struggles of how to raise a child in two separate homes with two separate sets of rules. Some of the immediate consequences are the challenges involved in that fact that whatever the problem was that split up the marriage in the first place was obviously never resolved: mom or dad still moved out. Some of the immediate consequences of disregarded marriage covenants are that children from broken homes are more likely to be ‘latch-key kids’ and less likely to have access to all the material and emotional support that their peers do. Some of the immediate consequences include the possibility that, at best, one may only ever get a good night kiss from one of their single parents.

 

But there is more than that in our world today; there are consequences for future generations as well. Many people who get divorced once wind up getting divorced twice or even thrice.[13] Children of divorce are more likely to be divorced themselves[14] and perpetuate the devastating cycle that contributes to generations and generations and generations going without the emotional, spiritual, and other support that only comes from strong marriage covenants.

 

This is sad because there is a great benefit from continuing in a strong covenant relationship but when we stray from it there are often devastating results. As one continues to read through the book of Judges, it becomes obvious that much misery comes as a direct result of the Israelites’ disobedience to their covenant with the Lord. There are consequences for not walking in proper covenants.

 

If we rebel against a covenant we are not released from it for bad behaviour.

 

Relating to the disobeyed covenant in Judges 2, we learn from in Joshua 9 that the Israelites were tricked into making this covenant agreement with the Gibeonites (who are Canaanites). They didn’t realise that in so doing they were defying their previous promise to God. They entered into this new agreement under false pretences. The Gibeonites lied to them but that doesn’t change the fact that Israel is now bound through the covenant her leaders made with the Gibeonites before God (Joshua 9:18; Judges 2:2). The leaders themselves are well aware that they are bound to keep this covenant (Joshua 9:18); when the Israelites find out that they have been tricked, they don’t nullify the agreement: they realise that it is not within their authority (or power) to do so; Israel still does not attack the Gibeonites. They don’t attack the Gibeonites because –even though they have been lied to, even though they have been tricked, even though they have been deceived – they are still bound to God and the Gibeonites via this treaty. Simply disobeying a covenant does not render it void (cf. Judges 2:1; Romans 3:3-4, 7:2; 1 Corinthians 7:10-14; Luke 16:16-16; Mark 10:1-12; Matthew 5:32, 19:9).[15] There are consequences for disregarding a promise but because we disobey a promise made before God does not render that covenant void (Romans 3:3,4).[16] God says, through His angel, Judges 2:1: “I will NEVER break my covenant with you.” The covenant with or the covenant before God is not nullified; the ties are not severed, just because one disobeys God.

 

There is another interesting point about the agreement that Israel enters into here (Joshua 9) that sets the stage for the book of Judges. Israel enters into a covenant with God first (cf. Genesis 15:7-21; Exodus 34:12-13; Numbers 33:55; Joshua 23:13) and this covenant says that He will give them the land and that they will not make a covenant with the Canaanites: they will instead destroy the present inhabitants of the land. Then the Israelites –without consulting God- enter into the second covenant with the Gibeonites (who are Canaanites) promising that they will not destroy them and in the process Joshua and the Israelites disobey the first covenant agreement with God.

 

The Both / And of Covenant.

 

Israel is understandably held to its original agreement with YHWH. It is understandable that Israel suffers the consequences (Judge 2:2-3; Exodus 34:12-13; Numbers 33:55; Joshua 23:13) for disobeying God by making this competing covenant. What is interesting, however, is that the Israelites are also held accountable to this new covenant with the Gibeonites, which they made before God even though they made it contrary to the expressed command of God (2 Samuel 21; Joshua 9, Exodus 34:12-13; Numbers 33:55; Joshua 23:13). The Israelites disobeyed God in making this second covenant but they are still held accountable to it. God holds them accountable to both covenants: the one that He initiated and the one that He forbade.[17]

In Judges 2, we read of the consequences for breaking the first covenant with God and in 2 Samuel 21 we see the consequences the Israelites suffer for breaking the second, competing covenant with the Gibeonites. God holds us to our promises. Whether we are lied to, tricked, or even enter into a covenant that is against the Lord’s commands, God holds us to our covenants that are made with Him either as a witness or as one of the parties Himself.

 

2 Samuel 21: 1ff:

During the reign of David, there was a famine for three successive years [people die]; so David sought the face of the LORD. The LORD said, “It is on account of Saul and his blood-stained house; it is because he put the Gibeonites to death.”  The king summoned the Gibeonites and spoke to them. (Now the Gibeonites were not a part of Israel but were survivors of the Amorites [Canaanites]; the Israelites had sworn to spare them, but Saul in his zeal for Israel and Judah had tried to annihilate them.) David asked the Gibeonites, 

 “What shall I do for you? How shall I make amends so that you will bless the LORD's inheritance?”

 

The Gibeonites answered him, “We have no right to demand silver or gold from Saul or his family, nor do we have the right to put anyone in Israel to death.”

 

 “What do you want me to do for you?” David asked.

 

They answered the king, “As for the man who destroyed us and plotted against us so that we have been decimated and have no place anywhere in Israel, let seven of his male descendants be given to us to be killed and exposed before the LORD at Gibeah of Saul—the Lord 's chosen one.”

 

So the king said, “I will give them to you.”

 

Verses13-15:

David brought the bones of Saul and his son Jonathan from there, and the bones of those who had been killed and exposed were gathered up. They buried the bones of Saul and his son Jonathan in the tomb of Saul's father Kish, at Zela in Benjamin, and did everything the king commanded. After that, God answered prayer in behalf of the land.

 

Even though the Israelites disobeyed God by entering into this covenant with the Gibeonites - and suffered their due consequences for disobeying the terms of the covenant with God- when they transgressed this new covenant that they made with the Gibeonites - even though it was against the expressed will of God - God did not even answer their prayers until they made it right.

 

Conclusion.

 

I would like to re-emphasise a couple of things: One, God does not sever the covenantal ties that bind us to (or before) Him. He is faithful to His promises, even if we are faithless (Romans 3:3,4). This is important for us to remember. We should not enter into our covenants lightly. I don’t believe that God says we can simply declare (through the courts or otherwise) that our partner did not live up to the marriage covenant and so we are no longer married (cf. Romans 7:2; 1 Corinthians 7:10-14; Luke 16:16-16; Mark 10:1-12; Matthew 5:32, 19:9). I don’t think that God says that simply because we had a drink we can throw out our Soldiership agreement. I don’t think the shackle is cut. I don’t think that God says that just because we decide not to be Officers anymore that we are released from our vow to ‘make soul-saving a primary purpose of our lives.’ I think that this covenant referred to in Genesis 15, Joshua 9, Judges 2, and 1 Samuel 21 points to the fact that God doesn’t break His covenants with us and as a natural result, there are consequences for us if we try to break that chain that binds.[18]

 

This brings me to my second point of emphasis: covenants are not punishments; the consequences for rebelling against covenants are not punishments; the consequences of rebellion are the natural and logical results of our own actions. As I have already pointed out, the origin of the Hebrew word for ‘covenant’ comes from a root word meaning, ‘to be shackled together.’ The image of a covenant then is one of being shackled to God through a promise. One can compare a covenant with God (be it through marriage, Soldiership, Officership …) to being shackled to a locomotive, with God being the locomotive. When we are chained to the train and ride comfortably on it – following the Lord’s leading - we wind up where He is going a lot faster and a lot easier than if we travel the tracks on our own strength (under our own steam).  This is the benefit of a strong covenant with the Lord.

 

If, however, once we are bound to the Locomotive of the Lord by a covenant, if we try to go our own way or try to shackle ourselves to something going in a different direction, it is not going to be a pleasant experience. The tie doesn’t break. Disobedience to our covenants is like jumping off the train and trying to run in the opposite direction while we are still chained to it. It is going to hurt but this is not God’s fault. He doesn’t throw us from the train and because God is faithful (cf. Rom 3:3,4) this covenantal chain is so strong that it won’t break - therefore what we suffer are the natural results of our own actions. This is what happened in the stories of the Judges (cf. Judges 2). God, wanting the Israelites to experience the full rest of the promise land entered into a covenant with Abraham and then with Israel. They willing shackled themselves to His train but later, however, the Israelites also shackled themselves to the Gibeonite train that was going in a different direction and suffered the natural and logical consequences of their actions. This is exactly what happens to us when we don’t respect our covenants.

 

There is good news in all this though and this good news is a great strength for covenanted people: no matter how many times we are faithless and jump off that train; no matter how many times we try to break the covenant; no matter how many times we throw ourselves on the tracks, under the wheels of the ‘God Train’, the Lord is faithful. While we are still alive (cf. Romans 7:1,2), there is opportunity to return to the Lord, the covenantal chain will not be broken.

 

God is faithful, and Jesus himself is standing here as the new chain that binds all of us in our relationship to God. Jesus is the new covenant through whom whosoever may will indeed be pulled back up onto the train as we turn to and rely on the Lord; so then instead of rebelling against God, instead of pulling against the tie that binds, let us all give our lives over fully to the Lord, buckle up, lean back and enjoy the fully sanctified ride on His train because His train is bound for glory.

 


 


[1] The ‘Judges’, with the notable exception of Deborah, were actually more like military rulers and ‘strong men’ than judges as we would think of them today.

[2] Exactly how many hundreds of years has been debated. If one adds up the total time of enslavement as if they were served consecutively, one would arrive at a total of 480 years. There is a distinct possibility that some of these times of enslavement could be served concurrently. It is also likely that no one tribe suffered the entire length of subjugation. Cf. Denis T. Olsen, NIB II: Judges, (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1998) 724. Cf. also Robert G. Boiling, Judges, AB 6A (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1975) 9-29.

[3] The extent of the periods of peace generally decline as the story progresses.

[4] Divorce Magazine.com has world statistics for divorce: Aus 46%, USA 45.8%, UK 42.6%, Can 37%; more statistics are available on-line at: http://www.divorcemag.com/statistics/statsWorld.shtml

[5] Michael Ramsay. Covenant: When God is Bound...a look at Genesis 15:7-21. Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 52, December 2007 – January 2008, pp 5-10. Available on-line at http://www.armybarmy.com/pdf/JAC_Issue_052.pdf

[6] G.E. Mendenhall. "Covenant." In The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, edited by George Arthur Buttrick. (Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon Press, 1962), 715.

[7] Ibid. Cf. also M. Weinfeld. "berith." In Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, edited by G. Johannes Botterweck. (Stuttgart, W.Germany: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1975), 253.

[8] Michael Ramsay, "Berit[h]" Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 40, December 2005 – January 2006  pp 16-17.

[10] Cf. David H. Madvig. Expositor's Bible Commentary, Pradis CD-ROM:Joshua/Exposition of Joshua. The ruse discovered (9:16-27), Book Version: 4.0.2.

[11] Also known as ‘Amorites,’ Cf. Gen 15:16.

[12] Child and Family Canada: Divorce, Facts, Figures, and Consequences. Available on-line: http://www.cfc-efc.ca/docs/vanif/00005_en.htm: Overall, about one third of all marriages in Canada end in divorce and the rate is somewhat higher for remarriages. Dissolution rates are even higher among cohabiting couples. Currently, there are no solid predictions of either a sharp decline or a sharp rise in divorce rates in the near future.

[13] Statistics Canada: The Daily: Wednesday March 9, 2005: Divorce. Available on-line at: http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050309/d050309b.htm: In 1973, only 5.4% of divorces involved husbands who had previously been divorced. Some 30 years later, this proportion has tripled to 16.2% of all divorces. Similarly, the proportion of divorces involving wives who had previously been divorced rose from 5.4% to 15.7% during this three-decade period.

[14]Divorce and Children: An Interview with Robert Hughes, Jr, PhD. Available on-line at: http://www.athealth.com/consumer/disorders/childrendivorce.html Cf. also from the Associated Press: Divorce Gap Narrows over time. Available on-line at: http://www.divorcereform.org/mel/rchildrenofdivor.html

[15] Notice that in a rare NT command attributed directly to God himself (1 Cor 7:10,12) – rather than human origin - even if a divorce is permitted, remarriage is not. Just because the original covenant is disobeyed does not mean it is rendered broken. It does not mean that one is released from it,

[16] God is faithful even when we are unfaithful (Romans 3:3,4). Cf. Cf. N.T. Wright, “Romans and the Theology of Paul,” p. 37. See also N.T. Wright, “The Law in Romans 2.”

[17]There were natural and logical consequences for the Gibeonites after their deception as well. They were saved but, as per the earlier instructions of Moses (Deut 20:10-15; cf. Josh 16:10; 17:13; Judg 1:28, 30, 33, 35), they became forced labour for Israel (Joshua 9:21).

[18] For a discussion on this as it relates to Genesis 15 and Abraham’s covent with God, see Michael Ramsay. Covenant: When God is Bound...a look at Genesis 15:7-21. Journal of Aggressive Christianity, Issue 52, December 2007 – January 2008, p 5. On-line at http://www.armybarmy.com/pdf/JAC_Issue_052.pdf

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

your shopping is guaranteed safe using SSL

eStore account - Sign Up Now! Contact Us - General. Technical Support. Sales Jesus is amazing!  If you see this image tag you should know that He is THE way... not a way!  Grace!
Home Terms of Use Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us
copyright ARMYBARMY
armybarmy